Legal Opinion
Cox v. Board of Estimate & Apportionment
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.
This application is for an order of mandamus directing the board of estimate and apportionment and the corporation counsel of the city of New York to institute proceedings to determine the compensation justly to be made to the petitioners for the legal closing of a portion of Spuyten Duyvil road in the borough of The Bronx, city of New York. The petitioners are joint owners of land, more fully described in the petition, abutting the south side of Spuyten Duyvil road. By resolution of the board, adopted June 13, 1924, pursuant to section 442 of the Greater New York Charter (as amd. by Laws of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The People v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Coster v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Reis v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Matter of Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Fearing v. . IrwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Merritt v. StuveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- White v. Meadow Park Land Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1948
- Cihal v. CarverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
- Davis v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937