Legal Opinion

People v. District Court

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 19, 1956No. 18108PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is an original proceeding in which petitioners seek relief in the nature of mandamus. Upon consideration of the petition filed by the Attorney General, rule to show cause issued, and pursuant thereto respondents filed their answer and supporting brief. There is no dispute between the parties concerning the facts which give rise to the questions we are called upon to determine; they are as follows:

The Public Utilities Commission in a proceeding pending before it entitled Harvey et al. vs. Harold E. Watson, Jr., entered an order which directed said Watson “to cease and desist from all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morron v. McDanielSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  2. Glenwood Light & Water Co. v. City of Glenwood SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  3. Snell v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Home Builders Ass'n of Metropolitan Denver v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. City of Montrose v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  3. Silver Eagle Services, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Colorado Office of Consumer Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Keystone, a Div. of Ralston Purina Co. v. FlynnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API