Snell v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous
Herein reference will be made to plaintiffs in error as plaintiffs; to defendants in error Public Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado and the individual members thereof, as the commission, and to the other defendants in error, as interveners. Plaintiffs here assert that the district court erred in sustaining the joint motion of the commission and interveners to quash a writ of review previously issued ex parte by that court directed to a decision of the commission, upon the grounds that plaintiffs’ petition therefor failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Greeley Transportation Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Allan v. GadboisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- Omri E. Daniels, Jr., Barge Hiskey and Bentley M. McMullin v. C. Sewell ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- DeCicco v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- Berryman v. BerrymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
- Public Utilities Commission v. Colorado Motorway, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- People v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956