Legal Opinion
Szymanski v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 3, 1947No. 4170PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
Plaintiff, Helen Szymanski, sued the defendant, The G-reat Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. The verdict and judgment were for plaintiff in the sum of $700, and defendant appealed on questions of law.
On'April 28, 1945, the plaintiff, having made some purchases in one of defendant’s food stores in Toledo, was accosted, on leaving, by a store detective, Marie Robinson, and was charged with stealing a can of mushrooms and a can of pimentos. She was taken to a lounge in the rear of the store and was questioned by Marie Robinson and the store…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- W. T. Grant Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
- Clinchfield Coal Corp. v. ReddSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Adams v. F. W. Woolworth Co.New York Supreme Court · 1932
- Halliburton-Arbott Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Dillon v. Sears-Roebuck Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fifth Club, Inc. v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. KellyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Webbier v. Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
- Sutherland v. Kroger CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
- Hendricks v. Leslie Fay, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.