Legal Opinion
Bridget A. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 5, 2007No. B195282PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*295Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
Absent extraordinary circumstances, at the 18-month
permanency review hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.221 the juvenile court either orders the return of a dependent child to parental custody or terminates reunification services and sets a hearing for the selection and implementation of a permanent plan pursuant to section 366.26. (§ 366.22, subd. (a); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.720(c)(1) & (3);2 see In re Elizabeth R. (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 1774, 1788 [42 Cal.Rptr.2d 200].) If the juvenile court determines there would be no substantial…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re Stephanie M.California Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Celine R.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Cynthia D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. Sergio D. (In re Destiny D.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- E.T. Ex Rel. Dougherty v. GeorgeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Ashley L.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Darlene F.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Jamie P.California Court of Appeal · 2013
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.