Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Stanley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1887No. 12,959PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action was originally commenced in the name of William L. Montgomery, as trustee for Emma Stanley, against Jacob Stanley. It was a suit upcm a bond executed by John and Jacob Stanley, conditioned that John Stanley should marry and provide for Emma Sutton, and maintain the child of which she was then pregnant, begotten of her body by John Stanley •, and further, that he would furnish Emma Sutton, his intended wife, with a suitable home, and treat her as a husband should. The bond stipulated, among other things, that if John Stanley failed to perform the conditions thereof, or should by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Furst & Bradley Manufacturing Co. v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Ward v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Perry v. RandallIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Stanley v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Schmied v. FrankIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ewing v. Van AlstineUtah Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Beyerline v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Closson v. BillmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. New York Life Ins. v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  5. Gifford v. GiffordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API