Beyerline v. State

The appellant was charged by affidavit and information with the forging of a promissory note, and on the trial was convicted of the offense charged, and sentenced by the court.

The errors assigned and discussed by counsel relate to the sufficiency of the affidavit and information, and the special answer, and also question the correctness of the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial.

In the affidavit and information it is charged, amongst other things, that the appellant “did then and there feloniously, falsely, and fraudulently, make, forge and counterfeit a certain…