Ewing v. Van Alstine
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County. — Hon. 8. W. Stewart, Judge. Petition by A. C. Ewing, named as executor, for the probate of the will of Charles Van Alstine, deceased. Contest by Charles Gr. Van Alstine and Helen E. Van Alstine, children of the deceased. Prom a judgment denying the probate of the will, the petitioner and another appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBaskin, C. J.
On May 15, 1901, Dr. A. C. Ewing, named therein as executor, filed an instrument purporting to be the lást will and testament of Charles Van Alstine, deceased, with the clerk of the district court, *196and a petition for the probate thereof. On the 12th day of June, 1901, Charles Gordon and Helen Emily, children of said Charles' Van Alstine, deceased, by Dora S. Van Alstine, their guardian, filed their opposition to the probate of said will, alleging as the ground of their opposition thereto that the said Charles Van Al-stine was habitually addicted to the excessive use of opium, stimulants, and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Renihan v. . DenninNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Sackman v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Poulson v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Raymond v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Keist v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Cook Associates, Inc. v. WarnickUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- In re Young's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1908
- In re Hanson's WillUtah Supreme Court · 1917
- Wood v. WoodWyoming Supreme Court · 1917
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.