Legal Opinion

Woods v. Sizer

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action upon a promissory note.

1Opinion of the CourtBorst, J.

The question presented in this case is as to whether.the defendant’s counterclaim should be allowed against the note on which plaintiff sues. The defendant made his note for value to the order of one Church. Thereafter and before the note became due Church transferred it to a bank. It was not paid when due and Church took it up and by transfers from him it has passed to the plaintiff. While the note was held by the bank, the defendant and Church, the payee, had dealings, the amount of which has been fixed by the jury and the stipulations of the attorneys. The payee taking the note from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kost v. BenderMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Andrews v. RobertsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Clark v. . McNealNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Chester v. . DorrNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  5. Devlin v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harter v. Peoples Bank of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  2. Kentucky Rock Asphalt Co. v. Mazza's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API