State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. North Carolina Textile Manufacturers Ass'n
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
All three of the appellants have excepted to the failure of the Commission to combine the fuel adjustment clause proceeding (Docket No. E-2, Sub 402, our No. 8110UC392) with the general rate case, and all three have assigned this as error and have brought the exceptions forward and argued them. They argue here, as they did in No. 8110UC392, that to allow an increase in rates based on increased fuel costs in an expedited proceeding under G.S. 62434(e) where there is no provision for inquiry into the reasonableness of the increased fuel costs rather than in a general rate…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Utility Customers Ass'n Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Bailey v. State, North Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Conservation CouncilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- In re Petition of Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.