Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. O'Connor

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1970No. 219PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The issue presented on this appeal is narrow, namely, whether a husband in a divorce action may be held in contempt of court for failure to pay the allowance made to his wife for her attorneys’ fees when the only motion upon which the contempt could be based was made by the attorneys on their own behalf for a *538judgment and no notice was given or request made to hold the husband in contempt.

In Wisconsin, as distinguished from some states,1 a request for an allowance for attorney’s fees by a wife in a divorce action is not an independent suit on the theory of necessities furnished to the wife.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miner v. MinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Spheeris v. SpheerisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In re MilburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Wahl v. WahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. King v. KingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Balaam v. BalaamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State Ex Rel. Pedersen v. BlessingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Tesch v. TeschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Anderson v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API