Legal Opinion

Department of Industrial Relations v. Pesnell

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1940No. 6 Div. 615PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

At the time this appeal was submitted in this court, it was extensively argued by respective counsel for the better part of two days. We were there informed, and the record bears out the statement, that the controlling question in this case is whether the appellee’s unemployment was directly due to a “labor dispute” as that term is used in Section 6(d) of the Alabama Unemployment Compensation Law, Acts 1935, pages 950, 958, which reads as follows: “Section 6. * * * (d) During Trade Disputes. An employee shall not be eligible for benefits for any week in which his…

2Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Bunny's Waffle Shop, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Sakrison v. PierceArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Walter Bledsoe Coal Co. v. Review Board of Employment Security Division of Department of TreasuryIndiana Supreme Court · 1943

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API