Legal Opinion
Eisenbise v. Crown Equipment Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 15, 2017No. Case No.: 15-CV-0972-AJB-WVGPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:(1)DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE FRED SMITH, (Doc. No. 59);(2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EUGENE VANDERPOL II, (Doc. No. 62);(3) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE MICHAEL FREEMAN, (Doc. No. 61); AND(4) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, (Doc. Nos. 63, 65)
Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court are Defendant Crown Equipment Corporation’s *1255(“Crown”) three motions to exclude Plaintiffs Nathan Eisenbise’s (“Nathan”) and Jeniffer Eisenbise’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) experts, (Doc. Nos. 59, 61, 62), as well as…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018
- Foster v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Parks v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022