Handschuh v. Albert Development
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered after post trial motions were denied. Appellant raises several contentions of error regarding the court’s failure to instruct the jury on the defense of assumption of the risk, error in instructing the jury on agency and error in molding the verdict. We affirm.
The facts of relevance indicate that appellee’s decedent was a plumbing contractor engaged in the task of installing a residential sewer line for appellant, Albert Development, at the site of a house being built by appellant, when he was killed in a trench cave-in accident. The job…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Fish v. GosnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Berman v. Radnor Rolls, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bullman v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Staub v. Toy Factory, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Schaeffer v. FreySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Mucowski v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Hardy v. Southland Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.