Hardy v. Southland Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion for removal of non-suit and granting of a new trial. Appellant raises one issue, whether the court erred in granting non-suit on the basis of the assumption of the risk defense. We reverse and remand.
Appellant brought suit to recover damages for an injury sustained at a 7-Eleven store owned by appellees. According to appellant’s testimony she entered appellees’ store on a day it had been raining, stepped onto a floor mat located just inside the doorway and, on her first step off the mat, fell on' the linoleum floor.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Fish v. GosnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bullman v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Staub v. Toy Factory, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Struble v. Valley Forge Military AcademySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Valentino v. Philadelphia Triathlon, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Frey v. Harley Davidson Motor Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.