Quinn v. Thigpen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
RodmaN, E.J.
One who has a contractual right to compel' another to convey is, upon the recordation of the contract, accorded the same protection as a grantee in a recorded deed. G.S. 47-18; Chandler v. Cameron, 229 N.C. 62, 47 S.E. 2d 528, 3 A.L.R. 2d 571; Winston v. Lumber Co., 227 N.C. 339, 42 S.E. 2d 218; Combes v. Adams, 150 N.C. 64, 63 S.E. 186. Here, the instrument under which the minors claim was recorded prior to the contract between plaintiff and defendant Thigpen. The only question for determination is, did the separation agreements under which the minors claim create an enforceable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Combes v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Winston v. Williams & McKeithan Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Potter v. Carolina Water CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fugate Ex Rel. Stroup v. FugateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Spates v. SpatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Crowder v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Watson v. Millers Creek Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- McDaniel Title Co. v. LemonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.