Young v. State of Oregon
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.
Plaintiffs, “white-collar” state employees employed between 1995 and 1997, seek post-judgment interest on supplemental judgments entered by the trial court in response to direction from this court in Young v. State of Oregon, 340 Or 401, 133 P3d 915 (2006) (Young III), and ask that that interest accrue from the date that the original judgment was entered. In a written opinion, the Court of Appeals held that sovereign immunity absolved the state from any obligation to pay interest. Young v. State of Oregon, 221 Or App 146, 188 P3d 476 (2008) (Young IV). For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
T…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Griffin v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Seton v. HoytOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Hunter v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sherman v. Dept. of Human ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Commonwealth v. GaitherMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Smith v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Anthony V. Albertazzi, P.C. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Skinner and SkinnerOregon Supreme Court · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.