Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Bickerton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 14, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as a full-time administrative assistant for approximately five years, at which point she was permitted to work a part-time schedule due to a medical condition. Claimant was fired a few months later when, again citing health concerns, she was unable to comply with the employer’s demand that she return to full-time status.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of NappiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of El NachefAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of NiedertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. In re the Claim of NiedertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API