Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of El Nachef
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 1, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 18, 2000, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant was employed as a sales associate in a Home Depot store where his work schedule usually enabled him to attend Muslim prayer services on Friday afternoons. In February 2000, however, a supervisor who was new to the store scheduled claimant to work on two consecutive Friday afternoons. When claimant objected that this scheduling would interfere…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Claim of CollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of AnthonyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of OdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of SaglimbeniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of AlasciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of FradysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of ChereshnevAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of BickertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of MalekniaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004