Legal Opinion

Jesz v. Geigle

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1982No. Civ. 10123PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULSON, Justice.

Curtis A. Geigle appeals from the judgment of the District Court of McLean County canceling a contract for deed and granting a one-year redemption period. We affirm.

On February 5, 1976, Esther Jesz sold certain real property located in McLean County to Mario J. Jesz and Sandra L. Jesz, husband and wife, on a contract for deed, and they, on May 26, 1978, with the written consent of Esther Jesz, assigned their interests under the contract for deed to Curtis A. Geigle. Under the terms of the contract for deed, Geigle was to make annual payments of $5,267.00 to Esther Jesz.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blondell v. BeamOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Marquardt v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Ryan v. BremsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Kincaid v. FitzwaterOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Atkochunas v. GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Heikkila v. CarverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Shervold v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Met Life Auto & Home Insurance Co. v. LesterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Striegel v. Dakota Hills, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Johnston v. AustinUtah Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API