Legal Opinion

Striegel v. Dakota Hills, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1985No. Civ. 10699PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Surrogate Justice.

This is an appeal from a “Final Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc” which canceled a contract for deed and foreclosed a security agreement. We affirm.

In January 1979, Curtis and Maurine Striegel executed a contract for deed to sell campground property to Gerald Biby. Biby subsequently conveyed his interest in the property by quit claim deed to Hillside Trust [Hillside], notwithstanding a provision in the contract for deed that Biby’s interest was not assignable without the written consent of the Striegels.

In March 1982, the Striegels brought a foreclosure action against Biby…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Tallackson Potato Co., Inc. v. MTK Potato Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Bender v. LiebeltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Gowin v. Hazen Memorial Hospital Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Heart River Partners v. GoetzfriedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Eldridge v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. North Shore, Inc. v. WakefieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Earthworks, Inc. v. SehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Johnson v. MarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API