Legal Opinion

Duresky v. Hanson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 14, 1983No. 82-459PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

Appellants commenced an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident by service on the Commissioner of Public Safety 9 days after the 6-year statute of limitations had run. Respondent moved to dismiss, claiming the court did not have jurisdiction because of lack of personal service upon him and for failure of appellants to commence the action within the prescribed period of the statute of limitations. The trial court dismissed the action “with prejudice.” We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

On May 13, 1973, the appellants were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SandkampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Bergman v. TurpinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  3. Long v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. V.H. v. Estate of BirnbaumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Fred R. Dunahugh v. Environmental Systems Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Melvyn L. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. Mercer v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Shamrock Development, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Johnson v. HusebyeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API