Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Baltazar v. Warden

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 8, 2014No. Case No. 07 C 4107PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Daniel G. Martin, United States Magistrate Judge.

For the reasons and to the extent stated below, Plaintiffs Amended Motion for Protective Order and Relief to Remedy Defense Counsel’s Deposition Misconduct [140] is granted in part. In all other respects, Plaintiffs protective order motion is denied. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Submit Supplemental Authority in Support of Amended Motion for Protective Order [155] and Second Motion for Leave to Submit Supplemental Authority in Support of Amended Motion for Pi’otective Order [171] are gi’anted. Discovery, including the continued deposition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erik Redwood and Jude Redwood v. Elizabeth Dobson and Harvey Cato Welch, and Marvin Ira GersteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Condit v. DunneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  3. Hunt v. DaVita, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. White v. Kenneth Warren & Son, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Black v. FriedrichsenDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  2. Boulder Falcon v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
  3. Marseet v. Rochester Institute of TechnologyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023
  4. Sokolova v. United Airlines IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  5. Van Osten v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API