Legal Opinion

Thomas-Bonner Co. v. Hooven, Owens & Rentschler Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 23, 1920No. 2557PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATER, District Judge.

At the conclusion of all of the evidence both parties moved for a directed verdict. Judge Hollister took the case under advisement. In due course, after his sudden death, it reached me for disposition as a part of his unfinished work.

For some time prior to April, 1915, the defendant had been endeavoring to construct for marketing a patented automatic typewriter. In the April issue of System, a magazine, the defendant advertised for 17 big caliber men as sales managers to introduce its new appliance, which managers were to measure up to the following standard:

“First. They…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Gruber v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Taylor v. OsbornWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Sloan v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Salmon Lake Seed Co. v. Frontier Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  3. Thomas-Bonner Co. v. Hooven, Owens & Rentschler Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  4. Ash v. Chas F. Noble Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Moore v. HechingerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API