Thomas-Bonner Co. v. Hooven, Owens & Rentschler Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
SATER, District Judge.
At the conclusion of all of the evidence both parties moved for a directed verdict. Judge Hollister took the case under advisement. In due course, after his sudden death, it reached me for disposition as a part of his unfinished work.
For some time prior to April, 1915, the defendant had been endeavoring to construct for marketing a patented automatic typewriter. In the April issue of System, a magazine, the defendant advertised for 17 big caliber men as sales managers to introduce its new appliance, which managers were to measure up to the following standard:
“First. They…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Gruber v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1890
- Taylor v. OsbornWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Sloan v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wheeler v. WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Salmon Lake Seed Co. v. Frontier Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
- Thomas-Bonner Co. v. Hooven, Owens & Rentschler Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Ash v. Chas F. Noble Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Moore v. HechingerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.