Legal Opinion
Thomas-Bonner Co. v. Hooven, Owens & Rentschler Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1922No. 3601PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
The parties were aligned below as here. In the year 1914 defendant, a manufacturer of machinery at Hamilton, Ohio, began to get out an automatic typewriter, by which a paper record, similar to that used in the player piano, was perforated by the operation of typewriter keys, from which record a theoretically indefinite number of successive reproductions could automatically be made — each in ribbon, typewritten form, as distinguished from carbon and other manifolding processes. In April, 1915, defendant was ready to market the machine. At that time the Thomas-Bonner…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Burck v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Farner v. FarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Worden v. AlexanderMontana Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re Lee Schoenfield, Bankrupt. Steven H. Dickman, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Lee Schoenfield, Bankrupt v. Lee SchoenfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Continental Ins. Co. of City of New York v. FortnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. HenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.