United States v. Elliott
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
HomER FERGUSON, Judge:
This case exemplifies the abuses this Court sought so assiduously to curtail in United States v Rinehart, 8 USCMA 402, 24 CMR 212. One of the several reasons oifered in that ease why court members must be denied access during trial to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, was that “many of the passages contained therein have been either expressly or impliedly invalidated by decisions of this Court,” and the members being untrained in the law have no Way of distinguishing the valid from the invalid, the material from the immaterial, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. RinehartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. SoccioUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. CothernUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. LowryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. ChaputUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. BennettU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. KrauseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. LewandowskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967