Legal Opinion

Harold Corp. v. Herzberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 26, 1959No. 58-535PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, E. HARRIS, Associate Judge.

The appellee Herzberg has obtained a jury verdict against the appellant corporation in an action for damages for personal injuries received by her when she walked into one of a series of sliding glass panels screening a serving bar at the rear of appellant’s beach hotel, where appel-lee was a guest.

The sole issue argued on appeal is that of contributory negligence, upon which ground appellant based its motion for directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case, subsequently renewed when all evidence was in. The facts as they relate to this issue are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A. C. Burton Co. v. StasnyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Kagan v. EisenstadtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  3. Pettigrew v. Nite-CapSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Clardy v. HudspethSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Stone v. Hotel Seville, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jiffy Markets, Inc. v. Vernon J. VogelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  2. Grall v. RisdenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. McCain v. Bankers Life and Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Brown v. Alabama Foods, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Peppermint Twist, Inc. v. Wright ex rel. WrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API