Legal Opinion
A. C. Burton Co. v. Stasny
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 28, 1949No. 12116PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEITH, Chief Justice.
This action <was brought by appellee, Charles A. Stasny, as father and next-friend of Charles Stasny, for the recovery of damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by Charles Stasny as a result of having walked through a plate glass window in the premises occupied by appellant, A. C. Burton Company, Inc.
The damages sought were alleged to have been caused by appellant’s negligence in maintaining a window in -its showroom in Houston, Texas, that had all the appearance and looked like an open door, without, markings to guard the approach of customers.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Houston National Bank v. AdairTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Marshall v. San Jacinto Bldg., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Stimpson v. Bartex Pipe Line Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
- Rosenberg v. HartmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Furst-Edwards v. St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Halepeska v. Callihan Interests, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
- Robert E. McKee, General Contractor v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Scott v. LiebmanTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Adam Dante Corporation v. SharpeTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Hall v. Medical Bldg. of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1952
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.