Legal Opinion

McCoy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 2014No. ED 99701PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILIP M. HESS, Judge.

Introduction

Marcus McCoy (Movant) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that defense counsel was ineffective for: 1) failing to call Movant to testify at trial; 2) failing to include a claim in his motion for new trial; and 3) withdrawing a request for mistrial. We affirm.

Factual Background

In March 2011, Movant was convicted of two counts of first-degree assault and two counts of armed criminal action, stemming from a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. State v. NunleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Aundra Woods v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Jason C. Voss v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Rick J. Cusumano v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Donald Henningfeld, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Esters v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API