Donald Henningfeld, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip M. Hess, Judge
Introduction
Donald Henningfeld (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court erred in denying his claim that trial counsel was ineffective for: (1) failing to present evidence of the victim’s alleged motive to fabricate the allegations; (2) failing to include a claim in his motion for new trial regarding the State’s use of impeachment evidence; and (3) failing to object to the trial court’s alleged improper instruction of the jury regarding notetaking during the trial.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- Strong v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Crews v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goodwater v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Jason C. Voss v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Eddie B. Linzie vs. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
- Hughes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017