Legal Opinion

Esters v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 2018No. ED 105912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

Colleen Dolan, Judge *921Terence T. Esters1 ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief ("PCR"), without an evidentiary hearing, and finding that Movant failed to prove his trial counsel was ineffective.2 Movant offers two points on appeal. Movant first argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. State v. TisiusSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  5. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Andrew Bullard v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. DAMIEN T. BRYAN, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Jessie L. Nelson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. VERNON EARL MILLER, Movant-Respondent v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API