Legal Opinion

Reinzi v. Tilyou

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1929PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.

The plaintiffs offered evidence from which the jury might find the following facts:

The plaintiff Michael Reinzi went with his wife, the plaintiff Frances Reinzi, on July 3, 1924, to seek recreation on the steeplechase horses at Steeplechase Park, Coney Island, operated by the defendant-appellant as an amusement park. The steeplechase horses are wooden horses constructed to carry two riders. They operate by gravity on an incline track 1,400 feet long and go up and down, straight away and around curves in sets of four horses each. A race is thus simulated, giving to the riders the thrill of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Goldstein v. . Pullman Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Tantillo v. Goldstein Brothers Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Benedict v. Eppley Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Rouillard v. Canadian Klondike Club, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API