Legal Opinion

Tantillo v. Goldstein Brothers Amusement Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1928PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

This case was tried upon the theory of negligence. In it is involved a principle important to proprietors and operators of theatres to which the general public is invited.

Plaintiff, fourteen years of age, accompanied by two other boys, visited defendant’s theatre at Utica and bought tickets for admission. Before entering the auditorium, they were accosted by a man unidentified either as an employee of the theatre or of the troupe then performing. At his suggestion the three boys returned their tickets, had their money refunded, passed the ticket taker without paying and entered the auditorium…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Platt v. Erie County Agricultural SocietyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Schubart v. Hotel Astor, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Philpot v. Brooklyn National League Baseball Club, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Reinzi v. TilyouNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API