Legal Opinion

Andonagui v. May Department Stores Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 2005No. B176544PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and appellant Bertha Andonagui (plaintiff) filed a personal injury action against defendant and respondent The May Department Stores Company (defendant), alleging general negligence and premises liability. Plaintiff pleaded her premises liability cause of action in two counts: negligence and willful failure to warn under Civil Code section 846.

*438The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend, determining that plaintiff’s entire action was barred by the one-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cooper v. Leslie Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andonagui v. May Dept. Stores Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Malsch v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Dela Torre v. County of FresnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Dela Torre v. County of FresnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Malsch v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API