Peterson v. Lindskoog
Appellate Court of Illinois
Creditor’s Bill.—Appeal from an order extending the powers of a receiver entered by the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1900. Statement of the Case.—A receiver was appointed under a creditor’s bill containing apt allegations of the recovery of a judgment at law (on March 4, 1897,) against the appellee JohnL. Lindskoog, and the return of execution unsatisfied.
Read the full summary
Creditor’s Bill.—Appeal from an order extending the powers of a receiver entered by the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1900. Statement of the Case.—A receiver was appointed under a creditor’s bill containing apt allegations of the recovery of a judgment at law (on March 4, 1897,) against the appellee JohnL. Lindskoog, and the return of execution unsatisfied. The bill alleged, further, that said Lindskoog (by deed dated February 27, 1897, and recorded March 1, 1897,) had made a fraudulent conveyance…
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding- Justice Shepard
delivered the opinion of." the court.
The question presented by this record is as to the right of a mortgagee in possession after condition broken, to hold: "the premises as against a receiver appointed upon a creditor’s bill filed subsequent to the execution, delivery and recording of the mortgage, the creditor’s bill being filed to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance of the premises by the judgment debtor to a third party, and the mortgagee not being a party to the bill, and the order extending the receivership over the particular property not being made…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barrett v. HinckleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Carroll v. BallanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
- Pollock v. MaisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Esker v. HeffernanIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Thomas v. Van MeterIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re. American Slicing Machine Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Altschuler v. SandelmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- Palkey v. DonichyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Van Ness v. AradoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
- Lipscomb-Russell Co. v. Hobbs-Henderson Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923