Legal Opinion

Lipscomb-Russell Co. v. Hobbs-Henderson Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 27, 1923No. 11190PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice CoTi-iran.

The appellant, American Slicing Machine Company, held a claim against Hobbs-Henderson Company, based upon the sale of one of its machines, under a contract retaining title. The contract was not recorded within 10 days, and not until after a "Receiver had been appointed. The Circuit decree allowed the appellant no priority over either prior or subsequent creditors, in the assets in the hands of the Receiver, and the machine company has appealed.

It appears that on February 7, 1922, at the instance of creditors, Iiobbs-Henderson…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In re Wilcox & Howe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  2. Carroll v. Cash MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Northumberland County Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Lawson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. American Trust & Savings Bank v. McGettiganIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Cash MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Tucker v. HudgensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API