Legal Opinion

Nesta v. Meyer

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 22, 1968PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

100 N.J. Super. 434 (1968)

242 A.2d 386

ALPHONSE NESTA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

ARNOLD MEYER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 11, 1968.

Decided April 22, 1968.

Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.

Mr. John F. Russo argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Vincent D. Enright, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Harth & Enright, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by LABRECQUE, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Alphonse Nesta appeals from a judgment for defendant following an adverse jury verdict, and from denial of his motion for a new…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rempfer v. Deerfield Packing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Kulbacki v. SobchinskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  3. Hartpence v. GrouleffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Berry v. Borough of Sugar NotchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Stoelting v. HauckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. CavalloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. State v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. State v. ThibodeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Ayers v. Jackson Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  5. Bellardini v. KrikorianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API