Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1976No. 7962PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This government appeal pursuant to the provisions of D.C.Code 1973, § 23-104(a)(1) is from a homicide case in which one of several investigating officers failed to preserve his notes of an initial interview of Special Police Officer James Saunders, a guard at the Veterans Administration Hospital where the incident occurred. In a pretrial hearing the court determined that the notes fell within the purview of the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (1970), and concluded that the nonproduction of the lost material warranted the sanction of a prospective bar to the witness’ trial testimony. 1 We reverse.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Middleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Fields v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. District of Columbia v. McConnellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Edwards v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API