Legal Opinion
Harris v. Geier
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided December 21, 1932PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Complainants are Auto Bus Operators Local Union 461 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Stablemen and Helpers of America, and two members of the local. Defendants are Joint Council No. 18 of the International Brotherhood and "Joint Council No. 18 Special Local," and three members of the joint council. The case is before the court on an order that defendants show cause why they should not be restrained from interfering with the affairs of Local 461 and from interfering with the employment of the individual complainants. A few months ago a similar order to show cause in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walsche v. SherlockNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Mayer v. Journeymen Stonecutters' Ass'nNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
- Great Council of the Improved Order of Red Men v. Mohican Tribe, No. 64New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921
- Int. Hod, C., No. 426 v. Int. Hod, C., No. 502New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
3Cited by18 opinions
- DeMille v. American Federation of Radio ArtistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Carroll v. L. No. 269New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Leeds v. HarrisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Wilson v. Newspaper, C., UnionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Lo Bianco v. CushingNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.