Legal Opinion

Heard v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1935No. 24056 (two cases)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

H. O. McDonald, as plaintiff, instituted action No. 445 in the superior court of Seminole county, Okla., against J. H. Heard and Drew Harber, defendants, to recover from said defendants damages occasioned by injuries inflicted by Drew Har-ber, the employee of J. H. Heard, upon the person of Vernon McDonald, minor son of the plaintiff, and upon the property of the plaintiff. H. O. McDonald, as father and next friend of Vernon McDonald, a minor, instituted action No. 446 in the superior court of Seminole county, Okla., against J. H. Heard and Drew Harber to recover damages for the injuries…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carder v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Retail Merchants Ass'n v. PetermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Barnes v. GainesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Small v. ShullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Wilburn v. McReeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  5. Greis v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API