Legal Opinion

Wilburn v. McRee

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 31, 1951No. 4311PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.'

This is an appeal from a judgment against appellants, George Wilburn and Fred Henry Hancock, in an action for damages resulting from an automobile collision. The sole question in the case is whether defendant, Fred Henry Hancock, was acting within the scope of his employment as an employee of appellant at the time of the accident.

The facts may be summarized as follows : Wilburn was engaged in the automobile business in McAlester, Oklahoma. Hancock was employed by him as a porter to clean up the office and wash and lubricate cars. Wilburn had gone to Hot Springs,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Camp v. ComerfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Lee v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Carder v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Retail Merchants Ass'n v. PetermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Heard v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garrett v. McReeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  2. Oil Daily, Inc., a Corporation v. Chester L. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API