Charles Ilfeld Company v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frantz.
Did the trial court err in determining that the provision of the contract, requiring Charles Ilfeld Company to maintain books of account and to make two-monthly inventories for Shelly and Blanche Allen and to furnish Raymond C. and Viola M. Taylor with statements of them, created material and essential conditions, the fulfillment of which was necessary in order to bring into being enforceable rights against the Taylors? Did the trial court err when it, in effect, held that the language of the provision was conditional rather than promissory in nature?
Affirmative…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Braddy v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Jennings v. Brotherhood Accident Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Green County v. QuinlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lake Durango Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Neves v. PotterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Main Electric, Ltd. v. Printz Services Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Mullenax v. National Reserve Life Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1971
- Myers v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.