Legal Opinion

Paduchik v. Mikoff

Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas

Decided November 5, 1951No. 56940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THOMAS, J.

From a Jury verdict against him in the sum of $3,000.00 awarded as damages for personal injuries suffered by the Plaintiff, and judgment thereon, the defendant moves for a new trial.

There was sufficient evidence from which the Jury could find the following facts.

Plaintiff, a boy of nine was crushed against the rear wall of his grandparent’s farmhouse by a backing 1947 pickup truck owned and operated by the defendant.

Defendant lives with plaintiff’s family on a farm three miles east of the Ohio-Pennsylvania line in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania. It is approximately twelve…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Finn v. SchreiberDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1940
  4. Schreiber v. National Smelting Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. NewkirkOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Department of Revenue & Taxation, Motor Vehicle Division v. ShipleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Finkbiner v. MullinsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1987
  4. Wilsch v. BencarOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. David L. Carpenter Doris G. Carpenter v. Gaf Corporation Carey Canada, Inc. The Celotex Corporation, Nicolet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API