Legal Opinion

DeLong v. Yu Enterprises, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2002No. CC 16-97-03468; CA A103729; SC S48281PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

The issue in this defamation case is whether a report of an alleged crime to police is subject to a defense of qualified privilege or absolute privilege. The trial court held that the report to the police at issue here enjoyed only a qualified privilege. The Court of Appeals disagreed and held that an absolute privilege applied. DeLong v. Yu Enterprises, Inc., 170 Or App 609, 13 P3d 1012 (2000). We allowed review and now conclude that only a qualified privilege applies to the kind of informal report that was made to the police in this case. Therefore, we reverse the decision of the Court of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Bank of Oregon v. Independent News, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Chard v. GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Pope v. MOTEL 6Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Morris v. Harvey Cycle and Camper, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Allen v. LeMasterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Gallo v. BarileSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Berian v. BerberianIdaho Supreme Court · 2020

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API