Legal Opinion

J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Roseland Box Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 5, 1930No. 30265PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.

■ This is a suit on two promissory notes, each for the sum of $2,622, with 6 per cent, per annum interest thereon from their date, December 29, 1927. The notes, were given for the balance of the purchase price of four' pieces of machinery, one of which was a Fay and Egan Electric Molder, the price of which was $6,300.

• The - defense is that the electric molder would not function properly for the purposes for which it was sold. This defense rests upon the alleged facts that before the contract for the purchase of the machines was made the entire matter was gone over fully by defendant and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fay & Eagan Co. v. Dudley & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Ducros v. Peoples Drug StoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Rowe v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Robinson v. Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  5. Meredith v. Fay & Egan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Radalec, Incorporated v. Automatic Firing Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. Washington Aluminum Company, Inc. And Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Pittman Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Perkins v. ChatryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API