Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 12, 1919No. 9735PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Nashville—Judge Christian. April • 9,1918.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. J. M. Robinson gave to Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Company three notes for the purchase-price of certain machinery. Title to the property was reserved in the vendor. Robinson signed a separate agreement of even date with the notes, containing the terms and conditions of the sale, one clause of which is as follows: “It is hereby agreed and understood by both iessor and lessee that no complaint shall be made by the lessee after he has been in the possession of the machinery thirty days.” Robinson haying failed to pay the notes, an attachment against him was issued and levied on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Moultrie v. Schofield's Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. DillonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Fay & Eagan Co. v. Dudley & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Beasley, Hallett & Co. v. Huyett & Smith Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  5. Brooks Bros. Lumber Co. v. Case Threshing Machine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Campbell Coal Co. v. PanoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Hall v. Eufaula Brick Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co. v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Frick Company Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Roseland Box Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API