Legal Opinion
Hall v. King
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stephen G. Crane, J.
Following the conclusion of a reference to determine the value of the plaintiff’s 45% share in the corporation Kings Antiques Corp., plaintiff Richard Hall moves (motion sequence No. 012), pursuant to CPLR 4403 to correct or vacate the Referee’s Report dated November 26, 1997 (the Report). Defendant Donald King moves to confirm the Report, and for other relief (motion sequence No. 013 [014 as amended]). These motions are consolidated for decision.
I. BACKGROUND
Kings Antiques Corp. (Kings Antiques or the corporation) is a well-established firm dealing in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blake v. Blake Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Matter of Seagroatt Floral Co. Inc.(riccardi)New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Spaulding v. BenenatiNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Friedman v. Beway Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Taines v. Gene Barry One Hour Photo ProcessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vick v. AlbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Munshower v. KolbenheyerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Murphy v. United States Dredging Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Cox Enterprises, Inc. v. News-Journal Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
- McDaniel v. 162 Columbia Heights Housing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2009