Legal Opinion
Raynes Associates Ltd. Partnership v. State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*485OPINION OF THE COURT
Israel Rubin, J.
Pursuant to CPLR article 78, petitioner seeks to annul as arbitrary and capricious a denial of its petition for administrative review (PAR) which is deemed denied due to the expiration of time (Administrative Code of City of New York § 26-516 [h], formerly § YY51-6.0.5 [h]). Respondent moves, pursuant to CPLR 7804 (f), to dismiss the petition on the ground that it was untimely brought (Administrative Code § 26-516 HD.
The facts are substantially undisputed. Respondent received a complaint of possible rent overcharge for apartment 7-J located at 2 Horatio…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- 140 West 57th Street Corp. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Montalbano v. De LuzioAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ista Management Co. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Raynes Associates Ltd. Partnership v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Guirdanella v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Kibel v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992