Legal Opinion

Harting v. City of Black Jack

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1989No. 54429PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON, Judge.

David Harting and his father, Irvin Hart-ing, appellants, appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the City of Black Jack (City), respondent. Appellants brought an action against the City to recover the value of property demolished pursuant to the City’s finding that the property was a “dangerous building” in violation of Ordinance 130.

On appeal, appellants contend that the trial court erred in: (1) finding that the City had not waived its affirmative defenses of failure to exhaust administrative remedies and failure to bring the cause within the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seliga Shoe Stores, Inc. v. City of MaplewoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Don Roth Development Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. City of Wright City v. Cencom of Eastern Missouri, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Wissmann v. German Evangelical St. Marcus Congregation of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Knipmeyer v. SpirtasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Chesterfield v. Deshetler Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Smith v. TangMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. James McNeill and Dennis McNeill Doing Business as McNeill Agency, Inc. v. Security Benefit Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. Roeben v. BG EXCELSIOR LTD. PARTNERSHIPCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Smith v. TangMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API