Legal Opinion
City of Wright City v. Cencom of Eastern Missouri, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 6, 1985No. 49604PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Judge.
Plaintiff, City of Wright City (City), sought a declaratory judgment of the meaning of a part of the Wright City Cable TV Ordinance enacted March 18, 1983. In the event City’s interpretation was sustained, it requested an injunction to prevent defendant Cencom of Eastern Missouri, Inc. (Cencom) from increasing the monthly subscriber charges for cable television from $8.50 to $10.00 for the basic service and $4.50 to $5.50 for expanded service. On City’s motion for summary judgment the trial court found in favor of Cencom. City appeals. We affirm.
The facts are undisputed. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCready v. SouthardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Gnau v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Cablevision, Inc. v. City of SedaliaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
3Cited by8 opinions
- McMullin v. BorgersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hendrix v. Wainwright IndustriesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Conroy v. City of BallwinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Environmental Quality Research, Inc. v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Harting v. City of Black JackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.